Superliga Femenina 2 2011-12

Superliga Femenina 2

Superliga Femenina 2 2011-12 Best players LIBERO
JugadorJugado RecepciónRanking
  PartidosSets#=!/-+Tot. Rc ind.Rc ind.Index

1

Carmona Tomas Laura
(CVB Barça)

16

61

197

35

0

24

80

126

462

0,5714

0,5714

0,5

2

Elizaga Gonzalez Angela
(Real Grupo Cultural Covadonga)

16

61

112

24

0

29

87

98

350

0,4486

0,4486

0,5

3

Capel Parra Gema
(GH Ecay Leadernet)

17

59

140

20

0

17

66

82

325

0,5692

0,5692

0,5

4

Martínez Miquel Anna
(CV Sant Cugat)

15

52

158

27

0

16

90

113

404

0,5644

0,5644

0,5

5

Schorb Singeser Maia
(CV Vall D´Hebrón)

14

49

119

22

0

14

67

90

312

0,5545

0,5545

0,5

6

Vallejo Lesmes Ana
(CAEP Soria)

12

45

129

20

0

15

92

107

363

0,5537

0,5537

0,5

7

Rodríguez Iglesias Patricia
(Feel Volley Alcobendas)

11

45

126

22

0

32

64

88

332

0,4819

0,4819

0,5

8

Diaz Lozano Raquel
(Voley Playa Madrid)

7

25

59

10

0

17

31

65

182

0,533

0,533

0,5

9

Gómez Preciado Beatriz María
(Extremadura Arroyo)

6

22

36

9

0

7

22

37

111

0,5135

0,5135

0,5

10

Naranjo Martin Laura
(AD A Pinguela)

4

16

24

10

0

8

21

56

119

0,521

0,521

0,5

11

Bouza Ferreiro Nuria
(Emevé Laboratorios Nupel)

5

16

42

13

0

14

21

30

120

0,375

0,375

0,5

12

Rodríguez Prendes Marta
(Real Grupo Cultural Covadonga)

6

15

31

10

0

6

13

13

73

0,3836

0,3836

0,5

13

Rodríguez Sánchez Antía
(CAEP Soria)

2

7

12

7

0

4

5

6

34

0,2059

0,2059

0,5

14

Calvo Ranz Viriginia
(Voley Playa Madrid)

1

5

4

6

0

0

8

8

26

0,2308

0,2308

0,5

15

Valle Regueiro Fatima
(Emevé Laboratorios Nupel)

1

3

6

3

0

0

9

7

25

0,4

0,4

0,5

16

Pena López María Fe
(Emevé Laboratorios Nupel)

1

3

8

1

0

2

6

5

22

0,4545

0,4545

0,5

Calculo de clasificación

Líbero

the ranking takes into account:

  • Reception Index (Rc ind.): positive receptions minus negative receptions divided the total receptions

The Skill is “weighted” multiplying the index with a specific coefficients per skill and per role and successively multiplied with another coefficient which determines the impact of the libero role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability.

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1

  • Minimum number of Receptions per set:  3